Your codes about the style of section gives me a very good example to learn TeXmacs further. Besides, I said “I thought TeXmacs and LaTeX should render out same equations.” means “I used to think, but now I don’t.”Īnyway, besides those words defending myself, I want to say thank you for your help. Then that’s it! I think you did more: you want to show how wrong I was to have this question even asked, which I think isn’t good. But otherwise the name text is printed in math mode, so that you can use, e.g. Please refrain from using math mode for non-math content, such as chemical. Maybe my question 1 is controversial, I thought it’s a bug, you say no. kind of adjustment is fine tuning like line breaks and page breaks. Add line breaks in long equations (so that they will fit our column width). So there’s no need to be sensitive and allergic to those words about LaTeX. I had never ever imply that TeXmacs is a follower of TeX/LaTeX to undermine the value of this software. Unfortunately, my examples just come from LaTeX, since there’s not many popular typesetting tools and they do have many similarities to compare. There’s no way to expose your intention better than giving examples. I always use LaTeX as an example because I want to address my problem efficiently and precisely. So what I ask for today is readability, method and convenience of method. #Newline in mathmod plusI agree what you said “Typography matters about readibility and visually pleasant arrangements.” and I plus one more: convenience. I never say TeXmacs should be a pixel-by-pixel/feature-by-feature substitute of TeX/LaTeX.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |